I don't normally blog opinion pieces on here but thought I'd share this one as I was asked to write a few things for the TEFL Workers' Union (here on Twitter and here on Facebook) on language discrimination. (And A level students might find it a useful model to look at/critique!)
Accent bias is real and affects people in tangible social and economic ways. Worst affected – according to the research – are those from working class and/or racialized minorities, as well as younger people starting off at university and in the workplace. For many people, the accent norm is seen as a southern, often RP, voice, but the reality is that the majority of people in the UK don’t have those kinds of accent. ‘Regional’ accents associated with industrial cities are often among the most stigmatized.
Accent bias is about more than just a few jokes and hurt feelings: it’s about making people feel they are not good enough, making them feel like they need to change to ‘fit in’, and about overlooking people’s potential, expertise and intelligence, all because of lazy stereotypes.
The problem is obviously widespread & structural too. Attitudes to accent are often more about attitudes to social groups, so the language is often just an index of that. Interviews we’ve done on the Lexis podcast with language experts like
Devyani Sharma,
Amanda Cole and
Lauren White all show this.
Educators have an important role to play in fighting back against accent bias and all it entails. We can’t argue for equality of opportunity on one hand and uphold reactionary and discriminatory language attitudes on the other. It’s incumbent on all of us working in education to challenge this inequality.
While it’s
usually good news for language educators to see issues about language prejudice
getting an airing in the media, it also tends to show the gulf between what
linguists think about language and what the general public thinks.
Last week,
various newspapers and online outlets ran stories on the publication of a report from The Sutton Trust about accent bias in the UK. The report featured
work from linguists on the Accent Bias Britain project at QMUL.
The
findings made pretty grim reading: 30% of university students and 25% of
professionals in workplaces said their accents had been mocked, while similar
percentages felt self-conscious about their accent.
There was
also a pattern of accents belonging to racialized minorities and people from
working class backgrounds reporting more mockery of their varieties, leading to
some people feeling a stronger need to change their accent to fit in.
Tellingly,
even when responding using exactly the same words, accents indexed as working
class and/or minority ethnic were rated as lower for professional expertise and
competence. Of course, who these lower ratings came from were interesting too…
mostly southern and upper class people.
None of
this is particularly new: accent bias studies have been conducted for the best
part of 50 years (and the Accent Bias Britain site is excellent for mapping and
summarizing these studies) and the accent hierarchy of the UK seems deeply
entrenched, along class, ethnic and regional lines.
What then
can linguists and the wider education community do to challenge this? There are
positive noises from the project about making people aware that accent bias
exists and to be conscious of it, and that seems to have an effect on responses
straight away in professional settings.
The
comments that followed many of these news articles give us an insight into what
we’re up against. One tweeter offered the cry laugh emoji at the end of their
deeply empathetic reply: “Do you need to ask
why anyone ‘would want’ to lose a brummie accent?”.
Others variously saw the report as some form of ‘wokeness’ (yawn) or an appalling lack of ‘resilience’ on the part of the respondents. ‘Get over it’, ‘deal with it’ and ‘it never did me any harm’ seemed to be the order of the day for many others, with reactionary narratives the norm.
The ‘it never did me any harm’ response is perhaps one of the laziest of all and brings to mind other favourites of the reactionary boomer - smacking, power cuts or even world wars (fought before they were born) among them - as things we should just get over without complaint.
What’s so lazy about this is the self-assurance that just because the person thinks it’s never done them any harm that no harm has been done. What about those opportunities you were never aware of because you’d been written off as unsuitable the moment you opened your mouth?
When presented with research like this showing that accent prejudice is rife and has real world consequences - denial of opportunity and equal opportunities for large parts of the population – we’ve really got to do better than writing it off as the hurt feelings of woke Gen Z snowflakes.
Language bias and discrimination is an issue that is at the heart of a lot of work that language educators get involved in education to fight against – often because we come from backgrounds that bear the brunt of these prejudices but also because it’s about fairness and equality. And kicking back against reactionary narratives around accent bias, challenging prevailing popular discourses and offering a critical and socially just response is something that I think is incumbent on us all to offer.
